{
  "question": "q80",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 5310,
    "completion_tokens": 1250,
    "total_tokens": 6560,
    "cost": 0.07068375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 5307,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.07068375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03318375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0375
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-09",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers put Precision on the same material path: claim $620,000 first priority in the CNC proceeds, concede Atlas’s priority in the inventory and cash proceeds, and ensure pre-receipt filing and notice for future shipments. Both allocate $620,000 to Precision and $1,040,000 to Atlas, leaving respective deficiencies of $900,000 and $760,000.\n\n[B] rejected: memorandum date of October 26, 2023 — record contradicts the 2025–2026 transaction chronology.\n[B] rejected: inventory perfection occurred before possession — internally inconsistent with attachment occurring on June 10 under Rule 1.\n\nFailed candidates. Equipment deadline stated as May 22 and Day 19: Different conduct failed.\nFailed candidates. Requiring future notice receipt rather than merely sending notice: Concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Express recommendation to file a proof of claim: Record support failed.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}