{
  "question": "q77",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 16493,
    "completion_tokens": 1419,
    "total_tokens": 17912,
    "cost": 0.1456475,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 16490,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1456475,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.1030775,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04257
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers lead counsel to oppose full guardianship, sale, and placement; obtain narrow emergency authority to pay the mortgage and payroll; suspend Marcus, compel an accounting, and recover the $85,000; and reassess Eleanor after treatment using decision-specific supports. Their differences do not alter Eleanor’s materially safe legal, financial, or residential position.\n\n[A] rejected: the two unremembered withdrawals were more likely someone else’s conduct — record lacks facts identifying those transactions.\n[A] rejected: the power has already lapsed because the delirium resolved — record establishes improvement, not resolution or satisfaction of the contemplated reassessment.\n[A] rejected: statutory multiple damages, attorney fees, and criminal or APS referral leverage are available — record lacks the governing remedial and reporting rules.\n[B] rejected: missing one mortgage payment could cause loss of the home — record lacks the loan’s default and foreclosure terms.\n[B] rejected: the LLC may be reached as Marcus’s alter ego — record lacks alter-ego facts or governing doctrine.\n\nFailed candidates. Power-of-attorney activation: concrete consequence failed because both answers suspend Marcus, invalidate the self-dealing transfer, and seek the same protective relief.\nFailed candidates. Immediate revocation and bank-first measures versus court-first relief: concrete consequence failed because both obtain enforceable protection and essential payments before the stated deadlines.\nFailed candidates. Breadth of the temporary account freeze: concrete consequence failed because both preserve assets while authorizing all identified essential expenses.\nFailed candidates. Timing and framing of replacement agency: likelihood failed because both condition durable replacement authority on Eleanor’s decision-specific capacity and use neutral interim protection.\nFailed candidates. APS or criminal-referral strategy: record support failed because no reporting duties, standards, or predictable recovery consequences were supplied.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}