{
  "question": "q77",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 12230,
    "completion_tokens": 1933,
    "total_tokens": 14163,
    "cost": 0.13442375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 12227,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13442375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.07643375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05799
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1552,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct counsel to oppose full guardianship, sale, and placement; suspend Marcus, compel an accounting and recovery; secure the mortgage and payroll through narrow emergency relief; and reassess Eleanor in 14 days before selecting supported decision-making, replacement agency, or limited conservatorship. No difference establishes a concrete, record-supported change in Eleanor’s legal, financial, or residential outcome.\n\n[B] rejected: “that condition appears to have resolved” — record establishes improvement, not complete resolution.\n[B] rejected: the POA “relies on your ongoing incapacity regarding the specific powers being used” — governing rule makes activation turn on the required certification, not a stated continuing-incapacity condition.\n[A] rejected: constructive-trust and alter-ego remedies — record supplies authority to restore property but not the additional legal rules required for those theories.\n\nFailed candidate: Direct protective order first versus immediate temporary conservatorship, potentially naming Nina — concrete consequence failed because Nina’s proposed authority is expressly limited and no misuse is established.\nFailed candidate: A seeks immediate preservation of LLC-held proceeds while B emphasizes accounting, return, and later civil recovery — concrete consequence failed because the record does not establish present or probable dissipation.\nFailed candidate: Different characterizations of POA activation, continuing incapacity, and revocation — different conduct failed because both readers would seek Marcus’s immediate suspension or removal and court-backed replacement authority.\nFailed candidate: A provides broader reassessment and supported-decision details — different conduct failed because both answers prescribe the same decision-specific reassessment and least-restrictive alternatives.\nFailed candidate: A identifies additional recovery theories — record support failed because those doctrines are not included in the supplied law and are unnecessary to obtain accounting and restoration.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}