{
  "question": "q75",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7298,
    "completion_tokens": 1276,
    "total_tokens": 8574,
    "cost": 0.08388875,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7295,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08388875,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04560875,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03828
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers lead counsel to classify Noah as nonexempt, invoke the three-year willful period, demand $46,800 in overtime plus $46,800 in liquidated damages, and seek $93,600 before attorney fees and costs. No supported difference changes Noah’s recoverable wages or materially alters the litigation path.\n\n[B] rejected: demand for accrued interest — record lacks any interest rule.\n[B] rejected: October 26, 2023 memorandum date — record lacks that date.\n\nFailed candidates. Different treatment of the primary-duty element — different conduct failed because both conclude the exemption fails independently on lack of discretion.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s calculated two-year fallback versus Answer B’s unquantified fallback — different conduct failed because both pursue the supported three-year claim.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s accrued-interest demand — record support failed.\nFailed candidates. Different settlement and filing recommendations — concrete consequence failed because the record establishes no resulting loss or procedural disadvantage.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s unsupported memorandum date — different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}