{
  "question": "q75",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "A",
  "winner": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 3401,
    "completion_tokens": 1243,
    "total_tokens": 4644,
    "cost": 0.0585425,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 3398,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.0585425,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0212525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03729
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 885,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-09",
  "report": "ANSWER A IS MATERIALLY BETTER.\n\nBasis. Answer A establishes nonexempt status, willfulness, all 120 actionable weeks, and a supported demand for $93,600 plus fees and costs. Answer B is an incomplete fragment that supplies no analysis, calculation, or demand, leaving its reader unable to advance Noah’s claim without reconstructing the entire answer.\n\nProof (winner verdicts only).\nExact difference: Answer B ends after “Transit Grove mis” and omits every required conclusion and calculation supplied by Answer A.\nDifferent conduct: Answer A’s reader demands $93,600 plus fees and costs; Answer B’s reader cannot make a supported demand without independently rebuilding the analysis.\nConcrete consequence: Noah’s $46,800 overtime claim and equal $46,800 liquidated-damages claim are not presented or advanced based on Answer B.\nRecord support: The supplied duties, compliance emails, 120-week period, $1,200 salary, and weekly hours establish nonexemption, willfulness, rates, and damages.\nMaterial magnitude: The omission leaves $93,600 in wage recovery, plus separately recoverable fees and costs, unasserted.\nLikelihood: A competent professional would act on Answer A’s complete calculation but could not safely act on Answer B’s unfinished sentence.\nNo safe neutralization by ordinary verification: Using Answer B requires deriving the exemption, limitations, damages, and litigation analysis from scratch.\n\nFailed candidates. Differences in formatting and memorandum style — different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. Because Answer B omitted the exemption analysis, limitations determination, damages calculation, and demand, the reader would likely withhold a demand instead of demanding $93,600 plus fees and costs, causing Noah’s supported wage recovery to remain unasserted.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}