{
  "question": "q74",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 15193,
    "completion_tokens": 1306,
    "total_tokens": 16499,
    "cost": 0.1341325,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 15190,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1341325,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0949525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03918
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place NovaCrest on the same materially safe path: immediate enrollment and intervention holds, continued care, prompt oversight reporting, emergency approval, affected-subject re-consent and notice, record preservation, individual scope verification, and ethics-board control over prior data. Their operational differences do not produce a concrete, record-supported difference in subject safety, rights, reporting compliance, or data integrity.\n\nFailed candidates. Re-consenting all 12 scheduled subjects versus only confirmed-v4.2 subjects — concrete consequence failed; no urgent need or harm from the additional re-consent is established.\nFailed candidates. Alternative reporting-deadline counting language — different conduct failed; both plans file well before either possible deadline.\nFailed candidates. Enhanced surveillance, forensic imaging, and additional outreach in Answer B — concrete consequence failed; the record identifies no outcome changed by these additions.\nFailed candidates. Different interim restrictions on previously collected data — different conduct failed; both preserve the data, continue safety collection, and defer continued-use authority to the ethics board.\nFailed candidates. Different mechanics and timelines for resolving the 62 unknown subjects — concrete consequence failed; both require subject-level verification and maintain intervention holds while status remains unresolved.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}