{
  "question": "q74",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 12224,
    "completion_tokens": 2416,
    "total_tokens": 14640,
    "cost": 0.14887625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 12221,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.14887625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.07639625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.07248
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2070,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers put NovaCrest on the same material path: immediate enrollment and intervention holds for defective or unverified consent, continued care, prompt oversight reporting, emergency approval, subject-level verification, re-consent or notice, preservation, and ethics-board control of prior data use. Both prevent implantation based on defective or unresolved consent and reject post hoc email and PDF replacement, so no record-supported client outcome differs.\n\n[A] rejected: requirement to obtain the ethics board’s data-use decision by Day 7 — record lacks any deadline for that decision.\n[B] rejected: requirement that corrected re-consent use an in-person discussion — record lacks a mandated re-consent modality.\nFailed candidate: interim freeze of nonessential affected-subject data use — concrete consequence failed; the record identifies no interim use or resulting harm before board review.\nFailed candidate: obtaining the data-use decision by Day 7 — concrete consequence failed; no client consequence from the additional internal target is established.\nFailed candidate: mandatory in-person re-consent — concrete consequence failed; no delay or lost intervention resulting from that modality is established.\nFailed candidate: timing of the completed event-subject’s corrective notice — concrete consequence failed; both require prompt disclosure and continued follow-up, with no harm from the minor sequencing difference shown.\nFailed candidate: differing internal reporting targets — different conduct failed; both direct immediate notice and filing within the governing clocks.\nFailed candidate: additional investigative, recordkeeping, and corrective-action detail in Answer A — concrete consequence failed; no different scope determination, deadline, or subject protection is established.\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}