{
  "question": "q72",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7159,
    "completion_tokens": 2799,
    "total_tokens": 9958,
    "cost": 0.12871,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7156,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12871,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04474,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.08397
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2347,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers calculate a $12,950,000 three-year BATNA, a $4,316,667 annual equivalent, and a $2,050,000 premium in Vireon’s proposal; both open at $10,800,000, target $12,000,000, negotiate the supplied nonprice terms, and reject the margin-based $10,000,000 rationale. After ordinary verification rejects Answer A’s contradictory day-110 instruction, both readers reach the same material path: preserve Northline’s offer, sign by day 30 if Vireon remains above the reservation price, and complete migration by day 120.\n\n[A] rejected: Day 110 as the decision point for signing Northline and completing migration by day 120 — record contradicts this because Northline’s offer expires on day 30 and migration requires 90 days.\n[A] rejected: losing Red Alder would impact Vireon’s marketing credibility — record lacks evidence of that impact.\n[A] rejected: the BATNA lacks a 12-month termination-assistance obligation — record lacks Northline’s contractual nonprice terms.\n[B] rejected: mandatory nonprice conditions within $1,000,000 of the ceiling and a near-red-line data ban — record lacks assigned values or supplied thresholds supporting those cutoffs.\n[B] rejected: Vireon has incumbent operational knowledge — record lacks evidence of that knowledge.\n\nFailed candidates. Day-110 switching sequence — no-safe-neutralization element failed because Answer A elsewhere expressly requires signing Northline before day 30, and the supplied dates make the conflicting instruction visibly impossible.\nFailed candidates. Different treatment of offers near or exactly at $12,950,000 — record-support element failed because no such counteroffer is supplied and the nonprice terms have no assigned values.\nFailed candidates. Different leverage characterizations — different-conduct element failed because both recommend preserving the same executable Northline alternative and withholding case-study rights.\nFailed candidates. Different negotiation sequencing details — concrete-consequence element failed because no record-supported client outcome changes while both preserve the day-30 signature deadline.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}