{
  "question": "q72",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 10700,
    "completion_tokens": 1370,
    "total_tokens": 12070,
    "cost": 0.10797125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 10697,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.10797125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.06687125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0411
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers calculate the same $12.95 million BATNA, $4.3167 million annual equivalent, $2.05 million Vireon premium, $10.8 million opening offer, $12 million target, and $12.95 million reservation price. Both direct Red Alder to activate Northline immediately, reject the unsupported $10 million rationale and day-100 threat, and sign Northline by day 30 if Vireon remains above the reservation price.\n\n[B] rejected: day-110 decision point and immediate Northline signature to complete migration by day 120 — internally inconsistent with the stated 90-day migration period, 30-day offer expiry, and Answer B’s own day-30 instruction.\n[B] rejected: unpriced nonprice value may justify exceeding $12.95 million — cited assignment rules prohibit assigning such value without a supplied dollar amount, and Answer B later directs switching whenever price exceeds $12.95 million.\n\nFailed candidates. Contradictory day-110 sequence — no safe neutralization failed; the contradiction is facial and the correct day-30 action remains expressly stated.\nFailed candidates. Exceeding the reservation price for unpriced terms — no safe neutralization failed; ordinary verification against the governing rules rejects it.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s omission of conditions on renewed case-study rights — concrete consequence failed because no value or resulting client harm is supplied.\nFailed candidates. Different interim negotiation checkpoints — concrete consequence failed because both preserve and execute the same day-30 alternative.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}