{
  "question": "q70",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 3300,
    "completion_tokens": 1910,
    "total_tokens": 5210,
    "cost": 0.07792125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 3297,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.07792125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.02062125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0573
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1632,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place Rosa on the same material path: sign the authorization immediately, attend the examination, preserve evidence, review the causation report on September 15, and evaluate the $210,000 offer before September 18 while preparing for the listed court dates. Ordinary verification corrects Answer A’s softened wording about mandatory cost shifting and record exclusion without changing any instructed action or leaving Rosa unable to act safely.\n\n[A] rejected: Rosa only “may have to pay” post-offer taxable costs after a judgment of $210,000 or less — record contradicts this by stating that she must pay them.\n[A] rejected: late prior-treatment records only “may” be excluded — record contradicts this by stating that the court will exclude them unless produced by August 28.\n\nFailed candidates.\nAnswer B’s omission of the $145,000 undisputed amount and $120,000 surgery expense — different conduct failed.\nAnswer B’s omission of an express instruction to cooperate reasonably at the examination — different conduct failed.\nAnswer A’s instruction not to make new case-related posts — different conduct failed.\nAnswer B’s description of the September 12 report as “due” rather than expected by that date — concrete consequence failed.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}