{
  "question": "q69",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 11192,
    "completion_tokens": 1326,
    "total_tokens": 12518,
    "cost": 0.10972625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 11189,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.10972625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.06994625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03978
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place Willowmere on the same material path: treat the safe harbor as unavailable, halt performance, exclude conflicted or uncleared directors, investigate the bonus, loan, and Meridian file, and obtain fully informed independent-committee review before shipment or payment. No record-supported difference shows that a competent professional receiving one answer would take materially different action or produce a different outcome for Willowmere.\n\n[A] rejected: “If the committee does not approve, rescind promptly” — record lacks the contract terms or any established unilateral termination or rescission right.\n\nFailed candidates. Leon’s status framed categorically in A but conditionally in B — Different conduct failed; both exclude his vote and committee participation.\nFailed candidates. Meridian letter assigned no weight in A but possible preliminary weight in B — Different conduct failed; neither relies on it for cleansing and both require further independent review.\nFailed candidates. B suggests considering shareholder approval while A does not — Different conduct failed; B does not recommend seeking it on the supplied facts.\nFailed candidates. A’s premature rescission instruction — No safe neutralization failed; ordinary review of the contract and available remedies rejects it before action.\nFailed candidates. Differences in the breadth of missing-fact investigation — Concrete consequence failed; both preserve the same pre-performance review and decision process.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}