{
  "question": "q69",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7982,
    "completion_tokens": 2650,
    "total_tokens": 10632,
    "cost": 0.12938375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7979,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12938375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04988375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0795
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2232,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers conclude that the safe harbor was not obtained because the required disinterested, independent majority did not approve after full disclosure, and both direct Willowmere to pause performance, investigate the conflicts and missing Meridian materials, and use an independent committee before proceeding. They also reach the same material conclusions on shareholder approval, exculpation, and the limitations of ratification. No demonstrated difference would put Willowmere on a materially different legal or operational path.\n\n[A] rejected: Willowmere has a present “meaningful window to rescind” and should rescind if the committee rejects the contract — record lacks contract termination terms or a rule establishing unilateral rescission.\n[A] rejected: the incomplete Meridian letter “cannot be relied on at all” — cited Rule 7 makes its weight dependent on missing facts rather than automatically zero.\n[B] rejected: the incomplete Meridian letter “carries no legal weight” — cited Rule 7 makes its weight dependent on missing facts rather than automatically zero.\n[B] rejected: seeking shareholder approval would imply the contract is outside the ordinary course and signal fiduciary breach — record lacks that rule or inference.\n[B] rejected: October 26, 2023 memorandum date — record lacks a date.\n\nFailed candidate: A’s firmer rescission instruction versus B’s rescission consideration — no safe neutralization failed because ordinary review of the contract and available remedies resolves the unsupported instruction.\nFailed candidate: A permits cancellation or renegotiation of the bonus while B recommends severance or waiver — concrete consequence failed; both prevent the undisclosed bonus from proceeding without independent action.\nFailed candidate: A describes ratification of the transaction while B describes voting on a new proposal — concrete consequence failed; both require a fully informed independent committee before performance.\nFailed candidate: A adds claim preservation and possible declaratory relief — likelihood failed; the record does not establish that litigation would presently occur or improve Willowmere’s position.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}