{
  "question": "q67",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7155,
    "completion_tokens": 707,
    "total_tokens": 7862,
    "cost": 0.065925,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7152,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.065925,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.044715,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.02121
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 443,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both readers would accept the case, retain both experts immediately, obtain certificates within 20 days, and file no later than Day 80. Both correctly determine that liability has preliminary expert support, Lena’s expected net recovery is approximately $498,667, and the firm’s $185,333 expected net return exceeds its intake threshold.\n\n[A] rejected: the panel’s 55 percent success probability reflects the neurosurgeon’s 60 percent causation assessment — record lacks any allocation of the panel’s probability among breach, causation, and other trial risks.\n\nFailed candidates. Day 75 target versus filing before Day 80 — concrete consequence failed; both schedules satisfy the policy and limitations deadline.\nFailed candidates. Different levels of detail in the records requests and initial steps — different conduct failed; both direct immediate expert retention, records collection, and complaint preparation.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s unsupported characterization of the panel probability — no safe neutralization failed to be proven; ordinary verification removes it without changing the acceptance decision or calculations.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s additional unconditional-verdict calculation — different conduct failed; it does not alter any required calculation or decision.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}