{
  "question": "q67",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 4897,
    "completion_tokens": 900,
    "total_tokens": 5797,
    "cost": 0.0576025,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 4894,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.0576025,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0306025,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.027
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 688,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers recommend acceptance, calculate the same recoveries and $185,333 expected net return, and direct immediate expert retention followed by certificate-supported filing before day 80. Both therefore place Lena and the firm on the same materially correct, safe legal, financial, and procedural path.\n\n[B] rejected: assertion that the panel’s 55% success probability reflects the neurosurgeon’s 60% causation assessment — record lacks any statement explaining how the panel derived its probability.\n\nFailed candidate: B’s panel-probability characterization — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidate: A’s 90-day statutory cushion versus B’s 60-day internal-deadline buffer — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidate: B expressly requests hospital records while A does not — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidate: A proposes filing around day 20 while B requires filing before day 80 — likelihood of different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}