{
  "question": "q66",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6271,
    "completion_tokens": 1869,
    "total_tokens": 8140,
    "cost": 0.09526,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6268,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.09526,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03919,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05607
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1552,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Emberline to accept the current offer before the deadline, based on the same correct expected costs: $1,500,000 for settlement, $1,858,750 for the counteroffer, and $2,250,000 for trial. After rejecting Answer A’s unsupported collateral statements, both readers remain on the same materially correct and safe path.\n\n[A] rejected: counteroffer “Variance” stated as only “$1,240,000 or $2,365,000” — internally inconsistent with the rejected branch’s three supplied trial outcomes.\n[A] rejected: trial creates an “unbounded-timing obligation” — record supplies neither unbounded exposure nor post-trial timing facts.\n[A] rejected: recommendation would survive “moderate revision of any single input” — record supplies no revised inputs or definition of moderate.\n[A] rejected: additional release, confidentiality, non-disparagement, payment-timing, and authorization steps — record lacks facts showing those terms or procedures are necessary to accept the supplied complete-release offer.\n\nFailed candidate: Answer A’s incorrect counteroffer variance description — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidate: Answer A’s unsupported timing characterization — record support failed.\nFailed candidate: Answer A’s unsupported robustness claim — likelihood failed.\nFailed candidate: Answer A’s additional implementation steps — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidate: Answer B’s omission of break-even and sensitivity calculations — different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}