{
  "question": "q66",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 5024,
    "completion_tokens": 1678,
    "total_tokens": 6702,
    "cost": 0.08173625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 5021,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08173625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03139625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05034
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1401,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers correctly calculate the relevant costs and direct Emberline to accept the $1,450,000 offer plus $50,000 transaction cost before the deadline. Ordinary verification rejects Answer B’s unsupported operational additions and inaccurate characterization of conditional expected cost as variance, leaving both readers on the same materially correct and safe path.\n\n[B] rejected: counteroffer outcomes are only $1,240,000 or $2,365,000, with an $865,000 rejection swing — $2,365,000 is the rejected branch’s conditional expected cost, not its realized cash outcome.\n[B] rejected: trial creates an “unbounded-timing obligation” and defers payment roughly four months — record supplies no payment-timing facts and provides bounded monetary outcomes.\n[B] rejected: board approval, additional release terms, confidentiality, non-disparagement, and payment-timing negotiations — record lacks facts establishing those requirements or concessions.\n[B] rejected: the recommendation survives moderate revision of any single input — record lacks a defined magnitude for “moderate revision.”\n\nCounteroffer risk characterization — concrete consequence failed.\nTrial timing characterization — different conduct failed.\nAdditional settlement action plan — concrete consequence failed.\nSensitivity and robustness assertions — different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}