{
  "question": "q65",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7109,
    "completion_tokens": 1288,
    "total_tokens": 8397,
    "cost": 0.0830675,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7106,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.0830675,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0444275,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03864
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place AlloyWorks on the same material path: recognize the February 3 modification, reject the affected-unit cap and invoice terms, calculate $3,200,000 in uncapped damages, and apply the $3,000,000 aggregate cap. Both support resisting Meridian’s $4,300,000 demand and treating $3,000,000 as the legal liability ceiling.\n\n[B] rejected: settlement target of “$3,000,000 to $3,150,000” — internally inconsistent with its instruction to offer only up to $3,000,000 and its stated $3,000,000 legal ceiling.\n\nFailed candidate: Expedited-freight classification as direct rather than consequential damages — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidate: Different depth of initial battle-of-forms analysis — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidate: B’s stated inspection and freight proof risks — concrete consequence failed because its recommended legal ceiling remains $3,000,000.\nFailed candidate: B’s settlement range above the cap — no safe neutralization failed because ordinary reading rejects the internally inconsistent, unsupported excess.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}