{
  "question": "q65",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6640,
    "completion_tokens": 736,
    "total_tokens": 7376,
    "cost": 0.06357625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6637,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.06357625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04149625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.02208
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 505,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers lead AlloyWorks to the same material path: recognize the February 2 contract and February 3 modification, reject the affected-unit cap and invoice exclusion, exclude the customer-specific lost profits, calculate $3.2 million before the cap, and treat $3 million as the settlement and judgment ceiling. No demonstrated difference changes AlloyWorks’ legally supportable conduct or financial position.\n\n[A] rejected: suggestion to dispute the certainty and support of damages that the stipulated facts say Meridian proves — record contradicts the suggested factual disputes.\n\nFailed candidates.\nExpedited-freight characterization as secondary loss versus mitigation expense — different conduct failed; both include the same $140,000.\nSettlement wording suggesting an opening below $3 million versus an offer up to $3 million — different conduct failed; both prescribe the same $3 million ceiling, and neither fixes a materially different opening offer.\nAnswer A’s suggestion to challenge stipulated damages proof — record support failed; the question states Meridian proves the listed amounts.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}