{
  "question": "q63",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8212,
    "completion_tokens": 1296,
    "total_tokens": 9508,
    "cost": 0.09020125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8209,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.09020125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.05132125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03888
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers conclude that the September email does not trigger discovery, calculate the same December 20, 2022–January 10, 2023 range and January 2, 2023 pivot, and direct Fathom to obtain the report-receipt date before moving only against professional negligence. Both also place the contract and fraud claims on the same timely path.\n\nFailed candidates. Answer A expressly says to preserve the limitations defense while Answer B does not — different conduct failed because Answer B’s targeted-discovery and conditional-motion instructions necessarily maintain the same defense path.\nFailed candidates. Answer B includes first learning the report’s substance within the missing fact — concrete consequence failed because both demand the same delivery and access evidence needed to resolve the January 2 pivot.\nFailed candidates. The answers request somewhat different additional discovery items — material magnitude failed because both prioritize the transmittal email, portal metadata, and receipt records and reach the same litigation decision.\nFailed candidates. Answer A calls fraud “not dismissible” while Answer B calls it “timely” — different conduct failed because both instruct Fathom not to pursue a fraud limitations motion.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}