{
  "question": "q62",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8629,
    "completion_tokens": 792,
    "total_tokens": 9421,
    "cost": 0.0776875,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8626,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.0776875,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0539275,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.02376
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 516,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Northwind to concede $400 for Arlo and $1,000 for Drea, assert limitations against Bina’s and Cato’s July renewals, defeat Cato’s cancellation claim under the former Act, and reject retroactivity and continuing-violation theories. Their differing settlement figures and peripheral recommendations do not establish a different concrete outcome on the supplied record.\n\n[A] rejected: “Northwind correctly applied transition rules here” — internally inconsistent with Northwind’s stated whole-life-of-agreement position and Rules 4, 6, and 9.\n[B] rejected: possible later renewals creating additional $500 claims — record lacks any subsequent renewal dates or reminder failures.\n[B] rejected: settlement range including a fee component — record lacks any fee-shifting rule or fee amount.\n\nFailed candidates. Different settlement targets ($1,250 versus $1,400–$1,800) — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Investigation and remediation concerning hypothetical later renewals — record support failed.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s inconsistent characterization of Northwind’s transition position — no safe neutralization failed because the contradiction is rejected through ordinary verification and the answer otherwise recommends the correct event-specific position.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}