{
  "question": "q62",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7695,
    "completion_tokens": 1632,
    "total_tokens": 9327,
    "cost": 0.09705,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7692,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.09705,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04809,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04896
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1429,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers identify the same four viable claims, $1,400 total statutory damages, governing versions, limitations defenses, and materially identical settlement posture. Answer A’s additional conditional advice about later renewals does not establish additional exposure on the supplied record; once its unsupported quantification is rejected, both readers remain on the same materially safe path.\n\n[A] rejected: quantified $6,000-per-subscriber exposure from subsequent monthly renewals — record lacks subsequent renewal dates and a monthly renewal cadence.\n\nFailed candidates. Additional renewal diligence and remediation — concrete consequence failed because the record establishes no later renewal or resulting claim.\nFailed candidates. Different global settlement range — concrete consequence failed because both answers anchor pleaded liability at $1,400 plus ancillary litigation costs.\nFailed candidates. Expanded admissions and defense instructions — different conduct failed because Answer B recommends the same defenses and substantive concessions.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}