{
  "question": "q58",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 5936,
    "completion_tokens": 1703,
    "total_tokens": 7639,
    "cost": 0.08818625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 5933,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08818625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03709625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05109
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1447,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers stop transmission, correct the net fund to $3,500,000, the point value to $350, Maya Ortiz’s estimate to $2,100, and the release’s scope and period. Both preserve the accurate tax and procedure paragraphs and correctly conclude that no renewed decision period is required because no notice was distributed.\n\n[A] rejected: withholding applies only to the wage portion — record lacks a definitive withholding rule and makes payroll treatment subject to final determination.\n[A] rejected: optional signed-request and objection mechanics — record lacks those procedural requirements.\n\nFailed candidate: A’s added withholding allocation — no safe neutralization failed; ordinary verification removes it without changing the corrected notice’s material path.\nFailed candidate: A’s optional exclusion and objection mechanics — no safe neutralization failed; the unsupported optional language is rejected.\nFailed candidate: A’s additional timing caveat and administrator safeguards — different conduct failed; both answers already require stopping the current transmission and replacing the defective file.\nFailed candidate: A’s more detailed explanation of possible estimate changes — different conduct failed; both answers produce the same corrected calculations and distribution decision.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}