{
  "question": "q58",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 5558,
    "completion_tokens": 1820,
    "total_tokens": 7378,
    "cost": 0.08933375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 5555,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08933375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03473375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0546
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1552,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers stop distribution, correct the omitted $270,000 agency allocation, use a $3,500,000 estimated net fund, calculate $350 per point and $2,100 for Ortiz, narrow the release to the executed terms, preserve the accurate tax and procedure language, and require no renewed period. Their additional differences do not establish a different material outcome after ordinary verification.\n\n[B] rejected: optional exclusion and objection mechanics — record lacks the required submission mechanics.\n[B] rejected: withholding applies only to an estimated $1,050 wage portion — record lacks final payroll and withholding treatment.\n[B] rejected: deadlines may require extension if correction delays transmission — record lacks the transmission date relative to October 2 and the response period represented to the court.\n\nFailed candidate: B’s optional procedure insert — no safe neutralization by ordinary verification failed.\nFailed candidate: B’s withholding calculation — no safe neutralization by ordinary verification failed.\nFailed candidate: B’s deadline-extension caveat — record support failed.\nFailed candidate: B’s additional file-control and verification steps — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidate: B’s additional percentages, averages, and explanatory detail — different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}