{
  "question": "q57",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 13639,
    "completion_tokens": 1183,
    "total_tokens": 14822,
    "cost": 0.12073,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 13636,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12073,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.08524,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03549
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 903,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct StreamLedger to seek limited deferral and targeted named-plaintiff production while preserving a timely present-record opposition, and both reject a broad six-month stay. Both place StreamLedger on the same material path regarding representative defects, enrollment-path variations, predominance, damages deductions, and possible narrower classes.\n\nFailed candidates. Motion timing: A recommends filing immediately, while B suggests another demand before filing — concrete consequence failed because both preserve the 21-day opposition deadline and no prejudicial delay is established.\nFailed candidates. Discovery details: B additionally proposes reciprocal defendant production, completeness certification, protective-order language, and a status conference — concrete consequence failed because none changes the requested targeted relief or StreamLedger’s litigation position on this record.\nFailed candidates. Subclass posture: B is somewhat more receptive to mobile, legacy, or weekend issue treatment than A — different conduct failed because both oppose the proposed full class and defer any narrower certification pending evidence.\nFailed candidates. Additional adequacy and record arguments: B emphasizes the absence of desktop and legacy representatives and requests more defendant-held records — different conduct failed because both seek denial or postponement on the same threshold grounds.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence because either answer leads StreamLedger to the same filing strategy and materially equivalent certification position.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}