{
  "question": "q53",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 12963,
    "completion_tokens": 1269,
    "total_tokens": 14232,
    "cost": 0.119085,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 12960,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.119085,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.081015,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03807
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both readers would reject Sales’ agreement-creating features and implement a prospective, advertising-only MAP policy with objective exceptions, independent monitoring, no retailer assurances or solicited reporting, and unilateral documented enforcement. Answer B’s acceptance language is facially inconsistent with the supplied rules and would be removed through ordinary verification, leaving the same materially safe implementation path as Answer A.\n\nB rejected: “Continued orders after the Effective Date imply acceptance of the supply conditions” — cited authority says retailer assent must not be sought or received.\nB rejected: “per se violation” — cited authority requires rule-of-reason treatment.\n\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s implied-acceptance clause — no-safe-neutralization element failed.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s less-developed discussion of alternatives, coverage, and review metrics — different-conduct element failed.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s cure period and additional implementation detail — concrete-consequence element failed.\nFailed candidates. Differences in acknowledgment wording — concrete-consequence element failed after removal of implied acceptance.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}