{
  "question": "q53",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 14254,
    "completion_tokens": 1356,
    "total_tokens": 15610,
    "cost": 0.12976375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 14251,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12976375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.08908375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04068
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Norvale to reject Sales’s concerted features and adopt a prospective, advertising-only unilateral MAP policy with no retailer assent, negotiated exceptions, enforcement assurances, complaint-based policing, or transaction-price monitoring. Both recommend objective exceptions, independent monitoring, centralized training and documentation, and unilateral enforcement supported by the same service rationale and market facts.\n\n[A] rejected: estimated HHI “roughly around 1,000” — record lacks the remaining manufacturers’ individual shares.\n[A] rejected: absence of a quantified price increase is “favorable” — record lacks support for treating missing price-effect evidence as affirmatively favorable.\n[A] rejected: enforcement because a checkout price “was visible to the public” necessarily converts MAP into resale-price regulation — internally inconsistent with its treatment of public price communications as advertising.\n\nFailed candidates. B’s five-day cure period versus A’s immediate graduated consequences — Concrete consequence failed: the record establishes no materially different legal or operational result.\nFailed candidates. Treatment of cart, checkout, and teaser language — Different conduct failed: both ultimately distinguish public price communications from confidential transaction prices.\nFailed candidates. B’s additional alternatives, metrics, and periodic-review detail — Concrete consequence failed: both recommend adoption subject to ongoing unilateral administration, and no different client outcome is established.\nFailed candidates. A’s unsupported HHI and price-effect characterizations — No safe neutralization failed: ordinary verification removes them without changing the recommended conduct or safety position.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}