{
  "question": "q52",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8027,
    "completion_tokens": 1254,
    "total_tokens": 9281,
    "cost": 0.087785,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8024,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.087785,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.050165,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03762
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 968,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Harbor Crust to seek immediate injunctive relief, complete and document the March 24 remodel, maintain logging and payments, demand comparator files, and reject the proposed $150,000 release. Their differences do not alter the materially correct and safe path toward preserving the franchise.\n\n[A] rejected: enforcing the remodel deadline after silence “violates the implied duty of good faith” — record supplies no such categorical rule.\n[A] rejected: the release demand shows Hearthstone knows its termination lacks legal standing — record lacks facts establishing Hearthstone’s knowledge.\n[B] rejected: the proposed release could be unconscionable or obtained by duress — record supplies no governing rule supporting that conclusion.\n\nFailed candidates. Remodel characterization as diligent progress versus the most dangerous ground — different conduct failed; both require completion by March 24.\nFailed candidates. Comparator scope of 24 months versus three years — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Payment with or without Harbor Crust’s reservation of rights — record support failed.\nFailed candidates. Specific performance versus declaratory relief and possible damages — likelihood and concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Different settlement counterproposal terms — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Different bad-faith and release theories — safely neutralized by ordinary verification.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}