{
  "question": "q51",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7803,
    "completion_tokens": 2074,
    "total_tokens": 9877,
    "cost": 0.110985,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7800,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.110985,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.048765,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.06222
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1712,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Hallowmere to cancel the three-day vote, preserve records, protect the audit, pay the vested $920,000 allocation, investigate independently, use only proportionate interim restrictions, and pursue expulsion only upon independently proven cause through disinterested voters and a fair process. No difference demonstrates a materially different client outcome.\n\n[A] rejected: escrow of the $920,000 if a legitimate dispute exists — internally inconsistent with its conclusion that the allocation is vested and the record presents no legitimate basis for withholding it.\n[B] rejected: expulsion would eliminate the named partners’ clawback exposure — record lacks any rule or fact establishing that expulsion extinguishes that exposure.\n[B] rejected: potential punitive damages — record lacks a punitive-damages rule.\n[B] rejected: negotiated separation is the only legally sound path — internally inconsistent with its own independent-investigation and compliant-expulsion alternatives.\n\nFailed candidate: Escrow alternative — different conduct failed because its stated condition is absent and Answer A otherwise directs timely payment.\nFailed candidate: Immediate negotiated separation or strict nondisclosure — concrete consequence failed because no suppression, waiver, or other harm follows on the supplied record, and Answer B expressly preserves the audit.\nFailed candidate: Clawback-exposure rationale for voter disqualification — different conduct failed because the identified redistribution interest independently disqualifies affected voters.\nFailed candidate: Punitive-damages warning — record support failed.\nFailed candidate: Negotiated separation as the “only” sound path — different conduct failed because Answer B’s operative recommendations also require pausing and independently investigating.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence because both answers place Hallowmere on the same materially safe course.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}