{
  "question": "q50",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 11319,
    "completion_tokens": 2129,
    "total_tokens": 13448,
    "cost": 0.13461,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 11316,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.13461,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.07074,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.06387
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1754,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place the members on the same material path: the side letter is incorporated and controls within its limited term and scope; Rhea should not be appointed unilaterally in the proposed role; and Julian cannot execute the loan. Both also reject apparent authority and waiver, preserve access and operations, and require notice, an executive meeting, mediation, and narrow relief rather than dissolution.\n\n[A] rejected: a base salary at or below $250,000 plus a performance bonus necessarily avoids joint approval — the operating agreement measures annual compensation, not base salary.\n[A] rejected: unilateral loan execution may create personal liability or a company breach-of-contract claim — record lacks rules establishing those remedies.\n[B] rejected: unilateral loan execution may create direct contractual or personal liability — record lacks rules establishing those remedies.\n[A] rejected: the court would force a mediation outcome or specific vote — record lacks authority for those remedies.\n[A] rejected: the threatened conduct necessarily constitutes breach of fiduciary duty — record states a good-faith duty but does not supply that characterization or remedy.\n\nFailed candidates. Base-salary workaround — different conduct failed because ordinary verification of total annual compensation neutralizes it.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s approved-budget check — concrete consequence failed because the record does not establish that the appointment is outside the approved budget.\nFailed candidates. Different descriptions of possible court relief — likelihood failed because both direct the members through the same deadlock process toward narrow relief.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s more detailed preservation and interim-governance protocol — different conduct failed because Answer A also directs preservation of access, ordinary operations, and financing options without unilateral commitments.\nFailed candidates. Unsupported liability and fiduciary labels — record support failed.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}