{
  "question": "q50",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6856,
    "completion_tokens": 2231,
    "total_tokens": 9087,
    "cost": 0.10977625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6853,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.10977625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04284625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.06693
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1871,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct the members to the same material path: the side letter is incorporated; neither Rhea’s hybrid appointment nor the bridge loan should proceed unilaterally; the informed lender cannot rely on apparent authority; no waiver occurred; and records, operations, and financing options should be preserved while deadlock procedures and narrow relief are pursued. No demonstrated difference changes the company’s legal, financial, or operational position.\n\n[A] rejected: reducing Rhea’s base salary to $250,000 or less necessarily avoids joint approval — record contradicts this by governing total annual compensation, not merely base salary.\n[A] rejected: Julian may incur personal liability or expose the company to a breach claim by signing alone — record lacks rules establishing those remedies.\n[A/B] rejected: deadlock procedures are prerequisites to every form of court intervention — cited Rule 7 makes them prerequisites only to judicial dissolution.\n\nFailed candidates. Incorporation-test wording (“signed and listed” versus “signed and either labeled or listed”) — Different conduct failed because the side letter satisfies both formulations.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s base-salary workaround — Record support failed because no bonus amount or resulting annual compensation is supplied.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s additional loan-liability speculation — Different conduct failed because both answers direct Julian not to sign.\nFailed candidates. Different descriptions of likely narrow judicial remedies — Concrete consequence failed because both preserve the status quo and contemplate narrow relief rather than dissolution.\nFailed candidates. Greater detail in Answer B’s preservation instructions — Different conduct failed because Answer A also directs withdrawal of lockout threats, preservation of cash, lender notice, and deadlock procedures.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}