{
  "question": "q49",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7127,
    "completion_tokens": 1016,
    "total_tokens": 8143,
    "cost": 0.07502,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7124,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.07502,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04454,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03048
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 765,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Adrian to concede default, accept total liquidated damages of $108,000, allow retention of the $90,000 deposit, and offer the $18,000 shortfall for a release. Both also direct him to oppose resale loss, carrying costs, specific performance, and attorney fees, producing the same materially correct settlement and litigation path.\n\n[A] rejected: assertion that the seller removed the property from the market “after default” — record lacks the timing needed to establish that sequence.\n[B] rejected: memorandum date of October 26, 2023 — record lacks any calendar date.\n\nFailed candidates. A’s more detailed litigation procedures — concrete consequence failed; both readers would assert the sole-remedy limitation and seek to cap additional liability at $18,000.\nFailed candidates. A’s conditional suggestion of interest, court costs, or a modest settlement premium — likelihood failed; it recommends no definite additional payment and depends on unsupplied procedural or settlement circumstances.\nFailed candidates. Unsupported timing and date statements — different conduct failed; ordinary verification removes them without affecting the remedy analysis.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}