{
  "question": "q48",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8308,
    "completion_tokens": 3157,
    "total_tokens": 11465,
    "cost": 0.14663125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8305,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.14663125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.05192125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.09471
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2717,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. After ordinary verification corrects Answer A’s facial calendar error and rejects its premature-termination language, both readers timely object, honor the cure period through Friday of the following week, demand a current written payoff, and close only upon release or an insurer-approved 125% escrow producing exception-free policies and lender funding. Both reject the unsupported $300,000 holdback and otherwise extend or terminate after the cure period on materially equivalent conditions.\n\n[A] rejected: “Extended Closing Date: Thursday of the following week” — internally inconsistent with its business-day count and Rule 2’s five-business-day extension.\n[A] rejected: termination if no payoff appears “by mid-cure period” or within three business days — cited Rules 6 and 8 require honoring the valid cure period through the extended date.\n[A] rejected: “not permitted to close on unmarketable title” — cited Rule 6 permits waiver, although the present lender condition makes waiver operationally unavailable.\n[B] rejected: specific performance through a compelled “price reduction equal to the verified payoff” — record lacks a contractual right to that reduction, and Rule 8 requires readiness to close on contract terms.\n\nFailed candidates.\nCure deadline and premature termination — element 7 failed: ordinary date and rule verification safely neutralizes them.\nPayoff itemization and release-detail differences — element 3 failed: no different closing outcome is established if a compliant current written payoff is obtained.\nWritten-tender procedure for specific performance — element 4 failed: the supplied rule does not require B’s additional formal tender mechanics.\nFurther-extension criteria — element 3 failed: extension is discretionary, and no direction of client harm is established.\nB’s additional lender, search, rate-lock, and operational safeguards — element 3 failed: no record-supported different outcome follows.\nSpecific-performance price-reduction proposal — element 7 failed: ordinary verification against Rule 8 safely rejects it.\nWaiver wording — element 2 failed: both readers would decline waiver under the existing lender condition.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence after ordinary verification.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}