{
  "question": "q47",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7903,
    "completion_tokens": 2480,
    "total_tokens": 10383,
    "cost": 0.12379,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7900,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.12379,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04939,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0744
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2070,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place the reader on the same material path: acknowledge the 19 unexcused days, condition the access and weather defenses on critical-path and concurrency evidence, seek the missing government records, propose conversion with resolution of excess reprocurement liability, calculate a $1,796,000 settlement, and reserve the unsupported $420,000 claim. After rejecting Answer B’s unsupported factual overstatements, neither answer produces a demonstrated difference in action or client outcome.\n\n[B] rejected: NRS definitively caused the 12-day access denial — record does not establish whether the denial was directed by the government.\n[B] rejected: the weather records support an excusable-delay claim — record does not establish critical-path impact or concurrency.\n[B] rejected: September 15, 2023 and the October 30, 2023 production deadline — record lacks those dates.\n[B] rejected: operations ceased immediately on August 15 and all equipment was inventoried — record confirms stopped work and property preservation but lacks those timing and inventory-completion facts.\n\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s broader records demand — Concrete consequence failed; the record does not show that the additional categories would change the default determination or settlement.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s waiver of further profit on the reserved claim — Concrete consequence failed; the record does not establish that any portion of the unsupported claim will become allowable performance cost.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s narrower mitigation, certification, and release language — Concrete consequence failed; no lost payment, claim, protection, or other adverse result is demonstrated.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s access and weather overstatements — No safe neutralization failed; ordinary record verification rejects them and leaves the reader with the same conditional positions stated in Answer A.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s unsupported record-exchange dates — Concrete consequence failed; no missed deadline or other adverse procedural event is established.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}