{
  "question": "q46",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7094,
    "completion_tokens": 1422,
    "total_tokens": 8516,
    "cost": 0.08699375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7091,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08699375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04433375,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04266
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\nBasis. Both answers direct Silverline to omit the waived solicitation challenge, file the known post-award grounds directly with the Board by September 11, request protected access, and supplement newly discovered facts, thereby preserving the automatic stay. Their differences do not establish a different material outcome because unsupported additions are safely rejected and both readers reach the same filing sequence and deadlines.\n[A] rejected: September 11, 2027 described as “Thursday” — record calendar identifies that date as Saturday.\n[B] rejected: conditional disparate-treatment count alleging relaxation of the experience requirement for Atlas — record lacks facts indicating relaxation or unequal enforcement.\n[B] rejected: agency-first filing “destroys the stay” categorically — record does not establish when the agency would answer, though it establishes that waiting is unsafe absent written suspension.\n[B] rejected: degraded weekend filing support, accelerated agency-report timing, override procedures, and six-figure injunction cost — record lacks those procedural and financial facts.\nFailed candidates. A’s incorrect weekday — element 7 failed because ordinary calendar verification safely corrects it without changing the September 11 receipt deadline.\nFailed candidates. A’s suggestion to supplement before September 14 — element 3 failed because the record identifies no later-discovered fact that would be omitted or concrete resulting harm.\nFailed candidates. B’s recommendation to file September 8 rather than by September 11 — element 3 failed because both dates preserve the same automatic stay and no filing failure is established.\nFailed candidates. B’s unsupported conditional count — element 4 failed because the record contains no evidence that Atlas received relaxation of the experience requirement.\nFailed candidates. Differences in requested relief, record-access mechanics, and court strategy — element 2 failed because no materially different present conduct is established while the automatic stay remains available.\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}