{
  "question": "q46",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8339,
    "completion_tokens": 1769,
    "total_tokens": 10108,
    "cost": 0.105185,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8336,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.105185,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.052115,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05307
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1376,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Silverline to omit the waived solicitation challenge, treat September 4 as the knowledge date, file the substantive Board protest no later than September 14, and ensure Board receipt by Saturday, September 11 to preserve the automatic stay rather than waiting on an agency protest. After rejecting Answer B’s facial weekday error and unsupported supplementation cutoff, both readers follow the same materially correct and safe filing path.\n\n[B] rejected: “Thursday, September 11, 2027” — record identifies September 4 as Saturday, making September 11 Saturday as well.\n[B] rejected: supplementation must occur “before the Merits deadline of September 14” — cited Rule 8 permits later supplementation for facts first learned from the agency report.\n[B] rejected: the tradeoff lacked justification that the technical advantage outweighed cost — record lacks any finding concerning the Authority’s stated tradeoff justification.\n\nFailed candidates. Incorrect weekday for September 11 — No safe neutralization failed; ordinary calendar verification resolves it without changing the filing date.\nFailed candidates. September 14 supplementation cutoff — No safe neutralization failed; checking Rule 8 supplies the correct rule without reconstructing omitted analysis.\nFailed candidates. Unsupported tradeoff characterization — No safe neutralization failed; rejecting it leaves the two record-supported evaluation grounds and price-based prejudice theory.\nFailed candidates. Filing today rather than by September 11 — Concrete consequence failed; either filing preserves the same stay.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s additional recommendation to seek Board discretionary relief if the stay is lost — Concrete consequence failed; the record does not establish that this produces a different result from Answer B’s court-relief path.\nFailed candidates. Different protected-record details and agency-protest sequencing after Board filing — Concrete consequence failed; both preserve the Board deadlines and request protected access.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}