{
  "question": "q46",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8226,
    "completion_tokens": 1326,
    "total_tokens": 9552,
    "cost": 0.09118875,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8223,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.09118875,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.05140875,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03978
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Silverline to omit the waived solicitation ground, file the complete Board protest by September 11, 2027, request protected-record access, supplement on newly learned facts, and avoid relying on an agency-first filing. Both therefore preserve the automatic stay and place Silverline on the same materially correct and safe procedural path.\n\n[B] rejected: “Atlas can be made whole for delay costs” — record lacks facts establishing recoverability of Atlas’s delay costs.\n[B] rejected: early filing “gives the Board time to rule before transition begins” — record lacks any Board decision timetable.\n\nFailed candidates. Answer B expressly recommends a Board discretionary-stay motion if the automatic stay is lost; different conduct failed because Answer A already identifies Board discretionary relief, and both answers’ recommended timely filing preserves the automatic stay.\nFailed candidates. Answer B suggests requesting a written agency suspension; concrete consequence failed because both answers require timely Board filing, making that suspension unnecessary to preserve the stay.\nFailed candidates. Differences in protected-record requests and injunction analysis; different conduct failed because both direct the same requests, supplementation, and emergency court action.\nFailed candidates. Answer A expressly excludes the waived ground from court filings; different conduct failed because Answer B also identifies the ground as waived and directs that it not be asserted.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}