{
  "question": "q45",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7189,
    "completion_tokens": 2388,
    "total_tokens": 9577,
    "cost": 0.1165675,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7186,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1165675,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0449275,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.07164
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1934,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Ironvale to treat the mixed-motive strike as an unfair-practice strike, restore the differential, immediately reinstate nonmisconduct strikers by displacing replacements, pay back pay from June 25, and assess misconduct individually. After ordinary verification rejects Answer B’s unsupported estimates and ancillary legal assertions, both readers remain on the same materially correct and safe path.\n\n[B] rejected: approximately 45 employees accruing $90,000 weekly — record lacks the striker count, and 45 × 40 hours × $25 equals $45,000.\n[B] rejected: interest, replacement-worker claims, notice posting, bargaining-order relief, and related remedies — record lacks those governing rules and necessary facts.\n[B] rejected: June 12 proved abandonment of the wage strike — record says the union required restoration plus resumed wage bargaining.\n[B] rejected: 85–90% adjudication probability — record lacks inputs supporting that numerical estimate.\n[B] rejected: five-business-day reinstatement timetable — Rule 4 and Answer B’s own analysis require immediate reinstatement.\n\nFailed candidate: immediate offers versus a five-business-day reporting date — no safe-neutralization element failed because the delay is contradicted by the supplied rule and Answer B’s own conclusion.\nFailed candidate: conditional investigation of the threat versus recommended denial — concrete-consequence element failed because the record does not establish whether the threat was credible or which disposition would harm the client.\nFailed candidate: formal concession versus preserving the classification argument — concrete-consequence element failed because both strategies cure the violation immediately and no different outcome is established.\nFailed candidate: severance and possible replacement-worker claims — record-support element failed because no assurances or governing claim rules are supplied.\nFailed candidate: quantified back pay, interest, and additional remedies — different-conduct element failed after ordinary verification rejects the unsupported figures and rules.\nFailed candidate: litigation hold, police referral, and internal controls — concrete-consequence element failed because no different client outcome is demonstrated.\nFailed candidate: wage movement during renewed bargaining — concrete-consequence element failed because neither answer specifies a materially different concession or resulting agreement.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}