{
  "question": "q44",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6527,
    "completion_tokens": 1442,
    "total_tokens": 7969,
    "cost": 0.08405,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6524,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08405,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04079,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04326
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1244,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct supervisors to reject the closure threat, card-signing inquiry, conditional raise, surveillance, and selective cafeteria restriction, while using lawful language on bargaining, dues, strikes, the preplanned increase, employee choice, and nonretaliation. Both also permit only voluntary comments without probing or adverse reporting and require complaints to be preserved and escalated without investigating union views, leaving competent supervisors on the same materially safe path.\n\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s less detailed substitute language — different conduct not proven.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s narrower preservation instructions — concrete consequence not proven.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s “it stays between us” language for volunteered views — likelihood failed because its separate complaint protocol requires escalation.\nFailed candidates. Different treatment of exact dues figures — record support failed because the figures were not supplied.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}