{
  "question": "q44",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6755,
    "completion_tokens": 2807,
    "total_tokens": 9562,
    "cost": 0.126425,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6752,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.126425,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.042215,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.08421
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2442,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. After ordinary verification removes unsupported statements, both readers follow the same materially safe path: communicate Halcyon’s preference without coercion, describe bargaining and strikes with uncertainty, implement only the documented preplanned increase, and prohibit interrogation, surveillance, selective enforcement, retaliation, and misuse of voluntary comments. Both also preserve and escalate coercion or retaliation complaints without investigating employees’ union views.\n\n[A] rejected: “our existing grievance process” — record lacks evidence that such a process exists.\n[A] rejected: “The current terms remain in place until a new agreement is reached” — record lacks a rule establishing that precise duration.\n[B] rejected: “The union has published dues and initiation fees” — record lacks evidence of published initiation fees.\n[B] rejected: “If workers strike, work stops and wages stop” — cited authority permits only an accurate statement that a strike can mean lost wages.\n[B] rejected: “There are no factual plans to close the plant” — record lacks facts about corporate plans.\n[B] rejected: “Outcomes depend on negotiations” as a closure response — cited authority requires closure predictions to rest on objective facts outside employer control.\n[B] rejected: “based on market factors” — record lacks the stated basis for the cost-of-living increase.\n\nFailed candidates. Unsupported factual and legal embellishments — no safe neutralization failed; each is removable through ordinary verification.\nFailed candidates. Answer B’s shorter instructions for voluntary comments and complaints — different conduct unproven.\nFailed candidates. Answer A’s instruction against any adverse action pending complaint review — record support failed.\nFailed candidates. Differences in detail and substitute wording — concrete consequence failed.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}