{
  "question": "q41",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 9225,
    "completion_tokens": 1800,
    "total_tokens": 11025,
    "cost": 0.1116525,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 9222,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1116525,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0576525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.054
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1351,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Lantern Row to pay the full $160,000 under protest by March 6, cure and document the nonmonetary matters by March 16, remain in possession, preserve the guaranty cap, and timely claim a $48,000 next-installment credit only if final March sales are below 70% of prior-year March sales. Their differences do not establish a different material action or outcome on the supplied record.\n\n[A] rejected: labeling March 6 “Friday” and March 16 “Wednesday” — internally inconsistent with March 1 being Monday and with the stated calendar-day counts.\n[A] rejected: guaranty exposure includes future rent until a replacement tenant is found — record lacks those remedial terms.\n[B] rejected: Lantern Row failed to submit a February sales statement — record lacks that fact.\n[B] rejected: missing the statement deadline necessarily forfeits the claim — record states the deadline but not that consequence.\n[B] rejected: post-termination obligations necessarily include accelerated rent, reletting costs, brokerage, holdover rent, and enforcement costs — record lacks those remedial terms.\n[B] rejected: additional insurance, force-majeure-notice, sales-certification, and notice-content requirements — record lacks those lease provisions.\n\nFailed candidates. Incorrect weekday labels in A — concrete consequence failed because both calendar dates and cure actions are correct.\nFailed candidates. B’s additional March-sales substantiation — different conduct failed because both require the final current-year and prior-year March figures, the below-70% comparison, and timely submission.\nFailed candidates. B’s notice review, injunction preparation, and conditional surrender planning — likelihood failed because timely cure removes the termination predicate under the supplied rules.\nFailed candidates. Treatment of the March credit — different conduct failed because both direct a next-installment credit when timely final figures unambiguously establish eligibility.\nFailed candidates. Additional guaranty and procedural consequences — record support failed.\nFailed candidates. A’s reservation concerning February despite rejecting February relief — concrete consequence failed because both pay the February shortfall and pursue no February credit.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}