{
  "question": "q41",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 9032,
    "completion_tokens": 1694,
    "total_tokens": 10726,
    "cost": 0.10726625,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 9029,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.10726625,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.05644625,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05082
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1290,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Lantern Row to pay the full $160,000 by March 6, promptly cure and document the nonmonetary issues, reject February relief, await final March sales, submit the statement by April 10, and avoid post-termination holdover. Their differences do not alter that materially correct and safe course or the preservation of the lease, March credit claim, and guaranty cap.\n\n[B] rejected: March 6 identified as Friday and March 16 as Wednesday — record calendar contradicts those weekday labels.\n[B] rejected: valid termination itself removes the guaranty cap — internally inconsistent with the later correctly stated holdover condition.\n[B] rejected: guaranty includes future rent until a replacement tenant is found — record supplies only “all post-termination obligations.”\n[B] rejected: preservation of a February co-tenancy claim — internally inconsistent with its conclusion that February cannot qualify.\n\nFailed candidates. Weekday mislabels — different conduct failed; the operative dates are correctly stated.\nFailed candidates. March 15 internal deadline in A versus March 16 in B — concrete consequence failed; both require completion by March 3.\nFailed candidates. Protest limited to March in A versus February and March in B — concrete consequence failed; both pay the full cure amount and reject February relief.\nFailed candidates. A’s notice-delivery-method verification step — concrete consequence failed; both cure before termination and no defective method is established.\nFailed candidates. April 4 submission preference in A versus April 10 deadline in B — concrete consequence failed; both timely submit the final statement.\nFailed candidates. A’s instruction for handling a later disputed credit — likelihood failed; the record establishes no such dispute.\nFailed candidates. B’s guaranty overstatements — no safe neutralization failed; ordinary verification against Rule 7 and B’s own later analysis rejects them before action.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}