{
  "question": "q41",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 9243,
    "completion_tokens": 772,
    "total_tokens": 10015,
    "cost": 0.080925,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 9240,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.080925,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.057765,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.02316
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 516,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Lantern Row to pay $160,000 by March 6 under protest, cure and document the nonmonetary issues promptly, submit final March sales data by April 10, claim any proven $48,000 credit, and avoid holding over after valid termination. The readers therefore follow the same materially correct path preserving possession, the March offset claim, and the guaranty cap.\n\n[B] rejected: March 15 as a possible nonmonetary cure deadline — governing rule measures fifteen calendar days after notice, making March 16 the deadline.\n\nFailed candidates. March 15/16 deadline ambiguity — different conduct failed because both answers require cure well before either date.\nFailed candidates. Verification of the landlord’s delivery method — concrete consequence failed because both plans timely cure the noticed defaults, preventing termination regardless.\nFailed candidates. Protest allocation between February and March — different conduct failed because both pay the full $160,000 and preserve only the potentially valid March claim.\nFailed candidates. Post-termination litigation posture — likelihood failed because both instruct Lantern Row to vacate by March 23 after any valid termination.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}