{
  "question": "q41",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 6303,
    "completion_tokens": 1375,
    "total_tokens": 7678,
    "cost": 0.08064,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 6300,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.08064,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.03939,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.04125
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both readers would pay the full $160,000 under written protest by March 6, cure and document the nonmonetary issues by March 16, remain in possession only while the lease remains valid, and submit final March sales data by April 10 to claim any proven $48,000 credit. The differences do not establish any materially different client action or outcome.\n\n[A] rejected: March 6 described as Friday — internally inconsistent with the supplied calendar, under which March 6 is Saturday.\n\nFailed candidate: A’s weekday error for March 6 — different conduct failed because A still directs timely receipt by March 6 and earlier payment preparation.\nFailed candidate: B’s recommendation to arrange payment by March 5 because March 6 is Saturday — concrete consequence failed because the record does not show that A’s instructed payment would arrive late.\nFailed candidate: B’s additional force-majeure and cure documentation — different conduct failed because both answers direct prompt documentation and continued operation, with the closure already excused or cured.\nFailed candidate: Different treatment of the next-installment credit — different conduct failed because both require proof of March eligibility before claiming the $48,000 credit.\nFailed candidate: Omission of verification of the landlord’s delivery method — material magnitude failed because both answers condition termination consequences on valid termination and prescribe cure regardless.\nFailed candidate: B’s “69.9% or lower” phrasing — record support failed because the actual March percentage is absent and both answers apply the controlling “below 70%” standard.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}