{
  "question": "q39",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7809,
    "completion_tokens": 3913,
    "total_tokens": 11722,
    "cost": 0.1661925,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7806,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1661925,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0488025,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.11739
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 3624,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. After ordinary verification, both readers follow the same material path: a $472,400 penalty, ion-exchange control operational by Day 120, twelve months of weekly sampling, exceedance controls, third-party verification, the authorized stipulated penalties, limited force majeure, and a release confined to disclosed pre-effective-date civil violations. The remaining drafting differences do not establish a concrete, record-supported change in Selwick’s ultimate legal, financial, or operational position.\n\n[B] rejected: $16,000 stipulated penalty beginning on the third exceedance day — record says the increase applies after three exceedance days.\n[A] rejected: “Construction Milestone” cross-reference to Section 5.2 — internally inconsistent with the milestone table in Section 4.2.\n\nFailed candidates. Payment at 30 versus 60 days — material magnitude failed.\nFailed candidates. Separate intermediate construction and startup milestones — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Different production-reduction specifications — record support failed.\nFailed candidates. Different reporting deadlines and detail — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Different conditions on the civil release — likelihood failed.\nFailed candidates. Third-exceedance stipulated-penalty threshold — no safe neutralization failed.\nFailed candidates. Incorrect construction-milestone cross-reference — no safe neutralization failed.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}