{
  "question": "q39",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 9061,
    "completion_tokens": 5389,
    "total_tokens": 14450,
    "cost": 0.2182975,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 9058,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.2182975,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0566275,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.16167
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 5011,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers place Selwick on the same material settlement path: a $472,400 penalty payable within 30 days, a Day-120 ion-exchange system, twelve months of monitoring and reporting, authorized stipulated penalties, limited force majeure, preserved enforcement rights, a civil release, and public-comment and court-approval conditions. The drafting differences do not establish a concrete, record-supported change in Selwick’s ultimate legal, financial, or operational outcome.\n\n[B] rejected: “Construction Milestone” cross-reference to Section 5.2 — internally inconsistent with the milestone table in Section 4.2.\n\nFailed candidates. Release vesting conditions — likelihood failed; the record establishes no future breach or untimely performance that would cause the conditions to produce different results.\nFailed candidates. Intermediate construction deadlines and 72-hour versus 24-hour testing — record support failed; the supplied facts establish only ordering within ten days and operation within 120 days.\nFailed candidates. Additional weekly reports, faster notice, and differing production controls — material magnitude failed; no material cost, disruption, or likely penalty consequence is established.\nFailed candidates. Force-majeure scope — likelihood failed; no qualifying event or expected delay appears in the record.\nFailed candidates. Responsible-officer definitions — different conduct failed; both require officer identification and certification.\nFailed candidates. Nonadmission wording — different conduct failed; both preserve the required jurisdiction and monitoring-data admissions while disclaiming disputed legal conclusions.\nFailed candidates. Public-comment duration, deadline rollover, and reporting duration — likelihood failed; no supplied dates or circumstances produce a demonstrated different outcome.\nFailed candidates. Construction-milestone cross-reference — no safe neutralization failed because ordinary citation verification resolves the evident internal miscitation.\n\nHard stop. It cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}