{
  "question": "q36",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8725,
    "completion_tokens": 4733,
    "total_tokens": 13458,
    "cost": 0.1965175,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8722,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1965175,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0545275,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.14199
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 4239,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both readers preserve responsive sources, investigate reseller control, produce the incident data and ordinary-course Emberline reports, narrow Requests 1 and 2, and segregate and log privileged material while producing underlying facts. Ordinary verification rejects Answer B’s conditions on producing reasonably available nonprivileged material; once rejected, no record-supported difference in the client’s conduct or outcome remains.\n\n[B] rejected: production conditioned on agency agreement or confirmation — cited Rule 3 requires production of reasonably available nonprivileged material despite objections.\n[B] rejected: October 2023 date, subpoena number, addresses, and July 2020 development date — record lacks those facts.\n[B] rejected: all responsive records identified and preserved and litigation hold already issued — record lacks those completed actions and reseller sources remain under investigation.\n[B] rejected: nonprivileged portions of counsel-prepared board materials may be redacted — cited Rule 4 says otherwise.\n[A] rejected: resellers have already been asked to preserve records — record lacks that action.\n\nFailed candidates. Conditional production — no safe neutralization failed because Rule 3 permits the conditions to be rejected without reconstructing the stated production scopes.\nFailed candidates. Request 1 endpoint and timing — concrete consequence failed because the record establishes no complaint omitted by the differing formulations.\nFailed candidates. Request 2 custodians, dates, terms, and sampling — concrete consequence failed because both are reasonable phased proposals and no missed responsive material is identified.\nFailed candidates. Request 3 narrowing and timing — record support failed because no specific nonprivileged communication produced under A but omitted under B is established.\nFailed candidates. Request 4 wording and treatment — no safe neutralization failed because the improper redaction option is directly contradicted by Rule 4.\nFailed candidates. Request 5 similarity definition — concrete consequence failed because both commit to producing the three events and substantially similar Osprey events within eight days.\nFailed candidates. Request 6 mixed-report treatment and timing — different conduct failed because both produce ordinary validation reports, withhold counsel-retained work product, and log it.\nFailed candidates. Privilege-log timing and fields — concrete consequence failed because both provide the required fields and document-level logging.\nFailed candidates. Clawback scope — record support failed because no separate proceeding or resulting waiver is established.\n\nHard stop. The required sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}