{
  "question": "q35",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 7028,
    "completion_tokens": 1886,
    "total_tokens": 8914,
    "cost": 0.10050125,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 7025,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.10050125,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.04392125,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.05658
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1552,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both readers would advise immediate voluntary disclosure before Larkspur transfers Priya’s identity, reject the unsupported nonwillful certification, plan payment of the same $228,000, and avoid quiet returns or waiting. Both provide the same material calculations, criminal-risk comparisons, liquidity assessment, and safe course of action; Answer B’s additional assertions do not establish a different client outcome.\n\n[B] rejected: a false nonwillful certification would be “worse than doing nothing” — record lacks comparative outcome probabilities for that path.\n[B] rejected: moving, closing, restructuring, or changing correspondence arrangements would compound civil and criminal exposure — record lacks a rule or supplied outcome data establishing that consequence.\n[B] rejected: quiet returns necessarily deliver a documented admission when Larkspur transfers Priya’s identity — record establishes only that quiet returns may identify her for examination.\n[B] rejected: borrowing immediately is preferable to retaining the available $32,000 cushion — record lacks borrowing terms and projected liquidity needs.\n\nFailed candidate: immediate borrowing versus keeping borrowing as a backup — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidate: additional account-preservation instructions — record support failed.\nFailed candidate: stronger characterization of quiet returns as self-identifying — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidate: “worse than doing nothing” characterization of false certification — likelihood failed.\nFailed candidate: submitting a disclosure request versus immediately entering and filing under the program — record support failed because initiation mechanics are not supplied.\nFailed candidate: different risk-tolerance rhetoric — different conduct failed.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}