{
  "question": "q35",
  "model_1": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-IQ4_XS",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8365,
    "completion_tokens": 726,
    "total_tokens": 9091,
    "cost": 0.0740575,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8362,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.0740575,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0522775,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.02178
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 516,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct Priya to make an immediate, truthful voluntary disclosure for $228,000 before the bank transfer ends eligibility, reject the unsupported nonwillful certification, and advise against quiet returns or waiting. They calculate the same costs, referral risks, liquidity consequences, and materially safe course of action.\n\n[A] rejected: document destruction “would create serious additional risk” — record lacks Selwick rules governing document destruction.\n\nFailed candidate: Answer A’s additional contingency instruction to reassess after authority contact or transfer — different conduct failed because both answers require immediate filing before that event.\nFailed candidate: Answer A’s more detailed liquidity comparisons — concrete consequence failed because both conclude Priya can fund the $228,000 disclosure and may use borrowing as backup.\nFailed candidate: Answer A’s unsupported document-destruction risk characterization — different conduct failed because both answers instruct Priya to preserve the records.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}