{
  "question": "q33",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "claude-opus-5",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "claude-opus-5",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 8313,
    "completion_tokens": 2298,
    "total_tokens": 10611,
    "cost": 0.1208925,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 8310,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1208925,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0519525,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.06894
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 2070,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "provenance_date": "2026-08-08",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct counsel to the same material path: establish April 20, 2021 as stop time, show seven years accrued, defeat each criminal disqualifier, and prove good moral character and medical hardship from the actual record. Answer B treats good moral character more cautiously and proposes broader corroboration, but Answer A also relies on restitution, sentence completion, employment, and the absence of other misconduct; the record does not demonstrate that the additional framing or evidence would change the ruling.\n\nA rejected: “four-weeks-per-night” infusions — record contradicts this with four nights per week.\n\nFailed candidates. Good-moral-character framing and additional character evidence — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Additional service verification, criminal records, and threshold motions — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Additional hardship contingency evidence — likelihood failed because the specialist evidence is undisputed.\nFailed candidates. Future-offense warning in Answer B — record support failed because no future offense is supplied.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ],
    "retained": [
      "substantive report",
      "verdict code",
      "winner mapping",
      "A/B assignment",
      "model and judge identifiers",
      "finish reason",
      "token counts",
      "provenance date"
    ]
  }
}