{
  "question": "q33",
  "model_1": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "model_2": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_a_was": "Qwen3.5-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "answer_b_was": "Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q6_K_XL",
  "verdict_code": "TIE",
  "winner": "TIE",
  "judge_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "server_model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
  "provider": "OpenAI",
  "finish_reason": "stop",
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 11357,
    "completion_tokens": 1302,
    "total_tokens": 12659,
    "cost": 0.1100375,
    "is_byok": false,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0,
      "cache_write_tokens": 11354,
      "audio_tokens": 0,
      "video_tokens": 0
    },
    "cost_details": {
      "upstream_inference_cost": 0.1100375,
      "upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0709775,
      "upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.03906
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1034,
      "image_tokens": 0,
      "audio_tokens": 0
    }
  },
  "eval_prompt_sha256": "7e58b951cb86e4deba3b60fd01e9b9bd247ebe9883e1c9e43b24acffb1fd4667",
  "report": "TIE, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.\n\nBasis. Both answers direct counsel to file for resident cancellation, establish April 20, 2021 as the stop date, treat the cannabis disposition as an excepted conviction, exclude audit costs from fraud loss, reject reckless injury as a crime of violence, and prove good moral character and medical hardship with substantially the same core evidence. No demonstrated difference would cause competent counsel to take a materially different path or produce a different result for Idris.\n\n[A] rejected: “four-weeks-per-night home infusions” — record contradicts this with four nights per week.\n[A] rejected: filing immediately will “lock in the claim and the date of application” — record lacks any rule giving filing that effect.\n[A] rejected: “jurisdictional challenge” — record lacks any jurisdictional issue.\n\nFailed candidates. Admission-date calculation caveat — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidates. Treatment of fraud disposition as a conviction — concrete consequence failed.\nFailed candidates. Good-moral-character analysis and evidentiary detail — likelihood failed.\nFailed candidates. Express recognition that relief may remain discretionary — different conduct failed.\nFailed candidates. Greater detail in Answer B’s motions and exhibits — concrete consequence failed.\n\nHard stop. The sentence cannot be completed with a concrete, record-supported consequence.",
  "judge_reasoning": "",
  "_public_record": {
    "type": "published record",
    "policy": "../../PUBLIC_RECORD_POLICY.md",
    "transformations": [
      "non-substantive machine metadata normalized",
      "published-record annotation added"
    ]
  }
}